Here is the order of importance when evaluating potential refactoring opportunities while reflecting on your code.
- 
              Identify Concepts:
              - Consider the Single Responsibility principle of SOLID. 
                  - Each collection of responsibilities should only have one reason to change.
 
- Group responsibilities at the method level.
- Group responsibilities at the class or concept level. 
                  - Group related methods into new classes.
- Ensure to create a related test class and migrate the affected tests.
 
 
- Consider the Single Responsibility principle of SOLID. 
                  
- 
              Name Things Well
              - Apply the Stages of Naming to variables, methods, class and test names
                  - Strive for meaningful names and avoid specific names in tests.
 
 
- Apply the Stages of Naming to variables, methods, class and test names
                  
- 
              Apply OLID of the SOLID Principles
              - Open/Closed Principle 
                  - Software entities (classes, modules, functions, etc.) should be open for extension but closed for modification.
 
- Liskov Substitution Principle
                    - Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.
 
- Interface Segregation Principle 
                    - Clients should not be forced to depend on methods they do not use.
 
- Dependency Inversion Principle
                  - Abstractions should not depend on details. Details should depend on abstractions.
 
 
- Open/Closed Principle 
                  
- 
              DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
              - Every piece of knowledge should have a single, unambiguous, and authoritative representation in the system.
- This principle is often misunderstood, with developers creating abstractions for things that appear similar but represent different concepts.
                  - Code is only repeated if it represents the same concept. This is true when the same sentence can be used to describe what it represents with out 'and'.