Test with confidence, code with clarity

Your home for mastering Test-Driven Development through real-world katas and expert guidance.

Browse Katas Learn TDD Fundamentals
TDD Buddy Logo
Latest Self-Healing Tests Are the Vendor Version of the Corrupted Signal

Kata Catalog

Practice TDD with a curated set of real-world katas, each with clear requirements and test cases.

Browse Katas

Guides & References

Learn best practices, naming conventions, and advanced TDD techniques from industry experts.

Explore Guides

Interactive Learning

Discover the TDD Gears model and learn how to apply TDD principles in real-world scenarios.

Learn More

Why TDD Matters More in the AI Era

The bar for "good tests" just moved. Agents made it non-optional.

  • The vendor pitch is a passing test after a behavior change. Strip the branding. The healing engine picks the visually similar element, the assertion runs, the bar stays green. The definition is the failure mode. The subscription is the answer to it, not the fix.
  • The flaky-test post named the false red. This is the false green. Same corrupted signal, opposite direction. The system under test's author silenced the alarm in the first case; the tooling silences it on the reviewer's behalf here, as a paid feature.
  • A false green is more dangerous than a false red. A human filters a red they know is flaky. Nobody filters a green. An automated pass on a behavior change is the reviewer's own eyes lying to them at the tool's cost center.
  • Fix the oracle, not the locator. A test asserting on receipt totals in domain money does not need healing because it had no rendering-time dependency to break. The oracle is the design decision the healing engine was invented to skip.

Read the argument: Self-Healing Tests Are the Vendor Version of the Corrupted Signal

The Bar Moved

Old bar

Tests exist and pass. Good enough for humans with context.

New bar

Scenario names · builders · domain types · ubiquitous language. The test suite is the interface agents operate against.

Rich TDD isn't a style preference anymore. It's infrastructure for compressed-role, AI-augmented teams.

TDD Gears

Shift gears based on context, not habit

TDD Gears model showing Low, Medium, High, and Reverse gears for test-driven development

Low Gear

New territory. Build context. Small steps. Learn the shape of the problem before solving it.

Medium Gear

Patterns emerge. Apply design principles. Let the tests guide you toward better abstractions.

High Gear

Known patterns. Follow existing architecture. Move fast because the structure is already proven.

Reverse Gear

Wrong direction. Back up. Delete the test. Try a different approach. This isn't failure — it's steering.

Learn More About TDD Gears